<% Dim Conn, dbPath dbPath = "D:\inetpub\wwwroot\bongologic\fpdb\afic_up.mdb" Set Conn = Server.CreateObject("ADODB.Connection") Conn.Open "PROVIDER=MICROSOFT.JET.OLEDB.4.0;DATA SOURCE=" & dbPath Set Session("_conn") = conn %> <% sqlArtDetails = "SELECT * FROM t_Articles Where Article_ID = "& Request.QueryString("ArtID")&"" Set rsArtDetails = Server.CreateObject("ADODB.Recordset") rsArtDetails.Open sqlArtDetails, conn, 3, 3 %> Time for the latest Fad Diet? t_Articles AFIC
   
Home Page
Food Facts Asia: 3x year resource newsletter, which features articles on current nutrition, food safety and science communication topics for use by journalists, health professionals, students and interested consumers.
AFIC leaflets, posters and brochures available for download
AFICNews: AFIC's monthly e-bulletin provides updates on regional events, the latest AFIC resources and analysis of recent news coverage of food safety and nutrition topics and issues.
Press Centre: Recent press releases and guidelines on where to go for more information.
Contact Us: Click here to request copies of AFIC publications, or to be added to AFIC's mailing list.
 
 

More AFIC Links

 
   
   


 
 
 

     

Journalist access

to expert database

Time for the latest Fad Diet?
 
t_Articles

The festive season is over and those persistent few pounds are hanging on. Time for the latest fad diet?

Most of us have been on a fad diet at some stage in our lives or we have known someone who has. Whether it's eating grapefruits until we can't stand the sight of them or juggling with combinations of different foods, dieting is not easy. Sadly, in the majority of cases, fad diets just don't work.

While Asia still has a long way to go to reach the incidence of overweight in countries like the United States, Britain and Australia, overweight is becoming increasingly common in this part of the world. Estimates show that as many as 20 percent of adults in some Asian countries are overweight. It's little wonder that they are turning to methods to help them lose weight quickly. But do weight control diets actually deliver what they promise? And how do you rank the "good" from the "bad" when it comes to weight control strategies?

"Fad diets are not the way to go," says Dr. Corazon VC Barba, Director, Food and Nutrition Research Institute, Metro Manila, Philippines . "Fad diets are a short-term, quick fix approach and do not deliver lasting weight loss. Food choices are usually very limited and kilojoule intakes are often very restrictive. Once the novelty wears off, so does the motivation to continue," she said.

The diet debate

In February 2000, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) sponsored a meeting called "The Great Nutrition Debate", a discussion panel that featured popular diet book authors as well as nutrition and weight loss researchers. The panel failed to reach any consensus on the best way to approach weight loss - not surprising given the widely differing views available in the popular press.

In the end, the USDA indicated that it would be timely for government researchers to evaluate commonly used weight loss diets to help sort fact from fiction. The department noted that there is a dire lack of scientific research to support the theories expounded in the majority of diet books currently on the market. Most diet books promise weight loss programmes that are easy to follow, that allow favourite foods or foods traditionally limited in weight loss diets, and that place no real emphasis on physical activity.

"Fad diet book authors often take a scientific half-truth that is complex and use that as the basis of their arguments," said Dr.Barba. "Authors may simplify or expand upon biochemistry and physiology in an effort to help support their premises and provide a plethora of scientific jargon that people do not understand but that seems to make sense. Few if any of these books offer solid scientific support for their claims in the form of published research studies. Instead, most evidence is based on anecdotal findings, theories and testimonials of short-term results."

Low carbohydrate, high protein diets

Some of the most popular diets to hit the bookstore shelves these days promote low carbohydrate and high protein intakes. These diets are nothing more than low calorie diets in disguise but with some potentially serious consequences. Following a low carbohydrate, high protein diet encourages the body to burn its own fat. Without carbohydrates however, fat is not burned completely and substances called ketones are formed and released into the bloodstream. Abnormally high ketone levels in the body, or "ketosis", may indeed make dieting easier since they typically decrease appetite and cause nausea. Ketosis also increases the levels of uric acid in the blood, which is a risk factor for gout and kidney disease in susceptible people. These diets can also result in dehydration, diarrhoea, weakness, headaches and bad breath. Over the long term, they may increase the risk of osteoporosis and coronary heart disease.

POPULAR FAD DIETS

Here's a rundown on some of the more popular diets that are making headlines

Low carbohydrate, high protein diets (such as Dr Atkin's Diet)

Premise or theory that the diet is based on:

Excess carbohydrate intake prevents the body from burning fat efficiently. Eating too many carbohydrates causes production of excessive amounts of insulin, leading to obesity and a variety of other health problems. Drastically reducing dietary intake of carbohydrates forces the body to burn reserves of stored fat for energy, a condition known as "ketosis". This in turn leads to decreased hunger and a metabolic advantage.

Dietary recommendations made:

  • Most of these diets limit carbohydrates to 20 grams per day for the induction phase of the diet and 0 to 60 grams in the ongoing weight loss phase. Carbohydrate intake ranges from 25 to 90 grams daily in the maintenance phase.

Nutritionists' comments:

  • There are no published scientific studies to support the claims made.
  • The diet relies on the fact that reducing carbohydrate intake causes the body to lose fluid. This shows up as kilograms lost on the scales however such "results" are short-lived as the lost fluid soon returns and the scales creep back up again.
  • The eating plans usually offer very limited food choices.
  • The diets are nutritionally unbalanced and excessively high in protein, fat, saturated fat and cholesterol.
  • The diets promote ketosis as a means of weight loss.
  • Dehydration is possible if large amounts of water are not consumed.
  • The diet is low in calcium, magnesium, vitamin C and folate (dietary supplements are recommended).

The "Zone" diet

Premise or theory that the diet is based on:

The "zone" is a metabolic state in which the mind is relaxed and focused and the body is strong and works at peak efficiency. A person in the "zone" will allegedly experience permanent body fat loss, optimal health, improved athletic
performance and better mental productivity. Insulin is released as a result of eating carbohydrates and this leads to weight gain. Because food has a potent, drug-like effect on the hormonal systems that regulate the body's physiological processes, eating the right combination of foods leads to a metabolic state (lower insulin and lower eicosanoid levels) in which the body works at peak performance and which results in decreased hunger, weight loss and increased energy. Eicosanoids are compounds that are involved in a wide range of body processes such as synthesis of certain fatty acids.

Dietary recommendations made:

  • To get into the "zone", rigid quantities of food, apportioned in blocks and eaten at prescribed times, are recommended in a distribution of 40 percent carbohydrate, 30 percent protein and 30 percent fat. Meals should provide no more than 2,100 kilojoules (500 kilocalories) and snacks less than 420 kilojoules (100 kilocalories).
  • Food should be treated like a medical prescription or drug.
  • Menus suggest lots of egg whites, nuts, olives, peanut butter and mono-unsaturated fats and large amounts of allowable fruits and vegetables. Alcohol is allowed in moderation but "zone" followers are advised to avoid or limit carbohydrates, especially pasta, bread, certain fruits and vegetables, such as bananas and carrots, and saturated fat.
  • The diet averages 5,400 kilojoules (1300 kilocalories) per day although some menus run as low as 3,600 kilojoules (860 kilocalories).

Nutritionists' comments:

  • The diet oversimplifies complicated physiological processes. For example, eicosanoids are one part of a complex system and no studies suggest that they are dangerous or cause disease.
  • The metabolic pathways that supposedly connect diet, insulin-glucagon and eicosanoids are not found in standard nutrition or biochemistry texts. The premise that any type of diet completely controls insulin and glucagon secretion is not supported by current nutrition or biochemistry knowledge. Glucagon has an effect opposite to that of insulin. Insulin's and glucagon's opposite actions help regulate carbohydrate metabolism.
  • The diet relies upon unproven claims based on case histories, testimonials and uncontrolled studies that are not published in peer-reviewed journals.

The "Eat-all-you-want-of-one-type-of-food" diet

Theory/premise that the diet is based on:

Whether it's bananas, pasta or eggs, this diet is based on the theory that after one or two days the dieter will become so bored with the limited repertoire of foods that he or she will reduce their kilojoule intake dramatically. Few people can eat very large amounts of one particular food only so energy intake drops markedly.

Dietary recommendations made:

Generally you can eat as much as you like of one food or a limited selection of foods. All other foods are restricted.

Nutritionists' comments:

  • Any weight loss is due to the fact that kilojoule intake is dramatically reduced.
  • The diet cannot be followed long-term as it is deficient in many vitamins and minerals.

Food Combining diets

Theory/premise the diet is based on:

Excess body fat is due to "improper food combinations". The idea is based on a belief that proteins need an acid environment for digestion while carbohydrates need an alkaline one.

Dietary recommendations made:

Followers are usually advised to take only fresh fruits and juices in the morning. They must also avoid combining protein foods (such as meat and dairy products) with carbohydrate foods (like bread and pasta).

Nutritionists' comments:

  • The idea that protein and carbohydrate cannot be taken together is based on erroneous theories regarding digestion. The body is perfectly capable of digesting mixtures of nutrients. The stomach is an acidic environment while the small intestine is alkaline. Digestion of protein starts in the stomach and is continued in the small intestine where most food digestion occurs.
  • Most foods contain a mixture of protein and carbohydrate.
  • Any weight loss is due to a lowered intake of kilojoules because of the limited number of foods allowed.

The Bottom Line

Although all of these diets may promote short-term weight loss, their long-term effectiveness is a different story. The bottom-line for lasting and healthful weight loss is a varied diet, reduced kilojoule intake and regular physical activity.

"The truth is that losing weight permanently takes work. It is not glamorous - eating habits need to change and activity usually needs to increase," notes Dr. Barba. "If a diet sounds too good to be true, it probably is."

Tips on spotting fad diets

  • Claims or implies a large or quick weight loss of more than 0.5 to 1 kilogram per week. Slow gradual weight loss increases the chance of weight loss success and of keeping weight off over the long term.
  • Promotes magical or miracle foods. No foods can undo the long-term effects of overeating and not exercising or "melt away fat".
  • Restricts or eliminates certain foods, recommends certain foods in large quantities, insists on specific food combinations or offers rigid inflexible menus.
  • Implies that weight can be lost and maintained without exercise and other lifestyle changes.
  • Relies heavily on undocumented case histories, testimonials and anecdotes but has no scientific research to back up claims.
  • Contradicts what most trusted health professional groups say or makes promises that sound too good to be true.

t_Articles

 
 

Copyright © 2004 Asian Food Information Centre (AFIC)
* Permission is granted to media, health and education professionals to use AFIC information resources in part or in full, providing credit is given to its source and AFIC is informed of its use by emailing info@afic.org.
No part of any AFIC information resources or the AFIC logo or its name may be used for any advertising or commercial product promotion purposes or with any commercially branded materials.